Comments on: Pourquoi Paris? http://anilcherukupalli.com/blog/2007/08/14/pourquoi-paris/ A little bit of everything Mon, 30 Jan 2012 19:21:41 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: Anil http://anilcherukupalli.com/blog/2007/08/14/pourquoi-paris/comment-page-1/#comment-68056 Anil Fri, 02 Nov 2007 19:35:30 +0000 http://arthedains.com/blog/2007/08/14/pourquoi-paris/#comment-68056 Non-Sensei: Yes, the same place. Indeed, pretty unremarkable grave it was. Apparently, to prevent vandalism and graffiti writing on nearby graves they have put barriers around the grave. The current headstone is actually a recent addition so perhaps the grave shown in the film was the previous version. The grave actually had a bust of him on the gravestone but it got stolen later in 1988. Non-Sensei: Yes, the same place. Indeed, pretty unremarkable grave it was. Apparently, to prevent vandalism and graffiti writing on nearby graves they have put barriers around the grave.

The current headstone is actually a recent addition so perhaps the grave shown in the film was the previous version. The grave actually had a bust of him on the gravestone but it got stolen later in 1988.

]]> By: Non-Sensei http://anilcherukupalli.com/blog/2007/08/14/pourquoi-paris/comment-page-1/#comment-68035 Non-Sensei Fri, 02 Nov 2007 13:31:02 +0000 http://arthedains.com/blog/2007/08/14/pourquoi-paris/#comment-68035 Ah, Pere laChaise? Quite an unremarkable final resting place, no? Not like the original, which was shown in the movie. I somehow don't remember steel barriers around it. That was in Dec 2002 though. Ah, Pere laChaise? Quite an unremarkable final resting place, no? Not like the original, which was shown in the movie.
I somehow don’t remember steel barriers around it. That was in Dec 2002 though.

]]> By: Extempore http://anilcherukupalli.com/blog/2007/08/14/pourquoi-paris/comment-page-1/#comment-57256 Extempore Mon, 20 Aug 2007 21:43:49 +0000 http://arthedains.com/blog/2007/08/14/pourquoi-paris/#comment-57256 Interesting actually... the flower seller photo that you're referring to is adorns Mark Tully's India in Slow Motion. And since Tully's such a seller at Crossword, they always have some in stock! :D But that picture is so very vintage McCurry, no? The book cover was the first time I'd seen it, but recognised it right off. A pic of his also on the cover of William Dalrymple's In Xanadu. Both the book and the photo are worth checking out. :-) Interesting actually… the flower seller photo that you’re referring to is adorns Mark Tully’s India in Slow Motion. And since Tully’s such a seller at Crossword, they always have some in stock! :D

But that picture is so very vintage McCurry, no? The book cover was the first time I’d seen it, but recognised it right off. A pic of his also on the cover of William Dalrymple’s In Xanadu. Both the book and the photo are worth checking out. :-)

]]> By: Australopithecus http://anilcherukupalli.com/blog/2007/08/14/pourquoi-paris/comment-page-1/#comment-56540 Australopithecus Fri, 17 Aug 2007 05:02:03 +0000 http://arthedains.com/blog/2007/08/14/pourquoi-paris/#comment-56540 oh yes that flower seller photo is amazing! have you seen some of the other kashmir ones? like the crocus harvest etc. oh yes that flower seller photo is amazing! have you seen some of the other kashmir ones? like the crocus harvest etc.

]]> By: Anil http://anilcherukupalli.com/blog/2007/08/14/pourquoi-paris/comment-page-1/#comment-56484 Anil Thu, 16 Aug 2007 23:49:27 +0000 http://arthedains.com/blog/2007/08/14/pourquoi-paris/#comment-56484 pecos Blue: Yes, I know what you mean. Thank you. Geetanjali: Thank you, I've corrected the mistake. pecos Blue: Yes, I know what you mean. Thank you.

Geetanjali: Thank you, I’ve corrected the mistake.

]]> By: Geetanjali http://anilcherukupalli.com/blog/2007/08/14/pourquoi-paris/comment-page-1/#comment-56447 Geetanjali Thu, 16 Aug 2007 17:50:52 +0000 http://arthedains.com/blog/2007/08/14/pourquoi-paris/#comment-56447 I know I know...but have to correct (you know by know it's second nature!) ... "Pourquoi avez-vous détruit..." (Past participle of the verb used in the past tense, remember?) I know I know…but have to correct (you know by know it’s second nature!) …

“Pourquoi avez-vous détruit…” (Past participle of the verb used in the past tense, remember?)

]]> By: pecos Blue http://anilcherukupalli.com/blog/2007/08/14/pourquoi-paris/comment-page-1/#comment-56151 pecos Blue Wed, 15 Aug 2007 00:51:14 +0000 http://arthedains.com/blog/2007/08/14/pourquoi-paris/#comment-56151 Because it is always paris, no? This was nice. Because it is always paris, no? This was nice.

]]>